On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Rob Napier <rnapier@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Oct 20, 2009, at 9:36 AM, Marcus Frenkel wrote:
> Marcus, can you explain better what you mean by "for thread-safe operation
> we cannot use enum gloox::ConnectionError in other thread?" Why is there a
> problem using this symbol?
I wanted to say that more threads can access the same value at the
same time. If we use something like:
if (error == gloox::ConnectionError::ConnDnsError)
in multiple threads at the same time, I think, theoretically it can
cause an issue.
Marcus