Re: Problem with glooxd simpleserver
From: Jakob Schroeter <js@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 22:20:22 +0200 (CEST)
Quoting Ivo Calado <ivocalado@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

Hi Tobias,
   yes, SASL ANONYMOUS could be a nice solution for my trouble. Do you have
any clue about how to do that?

featuresasl.cpp would be the place to add it. XEP-0175 documents the protocol.

However, it would be easier to just accept any credentials in SimpleServer::handleSASLPlain() (like the sample implementation does).


Sorry, but I'm newbie in glooxd

Pretty much everyone is. :)

cheers,
Jakob