Hi Jakob,
I am not using this implementation of IBB for user-to-user communication
yet, but was thinking about using it, and my application indeed consists in
transferring things that are not strictly in the realm of file transfers (eg
pictures and files/attachments).
I am not familiar with the <iq/>-based IBBs as you put it, so don't know yet
what I'd be missing or gaining by a change in API.
Thanks,
Philippe
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jakob Schroeter [mailto:js@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 6:09 AM
> To: gloox-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gloox-dev] future of in-band bytestreams
>
> Hi all,
>
> Does anyone use the current implementation of in-band bytestreams (XEP-
> 0047)
> for something that could not be achieved with "real" file transfer, i.e.
> XEPs
> 0095 and 0096?
> I'm thinking about removing the current <message/>-based implementation in
> favor of <iq/>-based IBBs + SI.
>
> cheers,
> Jakob