Re: gloox 0.9.3
From: Jakob Schroeter <js@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 21:14:15 +0200 (CEST)
On Thu Jul 19 2007, Philippe Roger wrote:
> A friend had his custom presence message set to a string containing a
> single quote as in " I'm not available" on GoogleTalk.  It is a pretty
> widespread service and all the GoogleTalk users who have such a customized
> string will not have it changed, or their client upgraded overnight, which
> means that a gloox-based client will have a hard time with those users for
> quite some time.

I talked to a Google server guy and he added the issue to his things to look 
into. I hereby forward his request for example xml where this occures. -)

Once their server is fixed, their clients can behave however they want.


> Jakob, I am not saying that you are not correct from a strict protocol
> point of view, but you can see how this particular gloox behavior in the
> face of such an error would negatively affect gloox for a while. ;-)   The
> real world is full of compromises that work-around other people's bugs for
> just that kind of widespread interoperability problem.

IMO the only way to get rid of the problem is to fix it in all offending 
implementations. I just submitted a patch for Jabberd2. ;)

cheers,
Jakob

Attachment: pgpbA1XZuYFYd.pgp
Description: PGP signature